Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:51

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

Just in the last 5 years:

Derek Jeter Shares Brutal Reality for Yankees After Dodgers Loss - Sports Illustrated

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Thank you.

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

The "F1" Reviews Are In - Dark Horizons

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

Newark Airport to open its shuttered runway Monday, 13 days ahead of schedule - NBC News

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

US won't label China a currency manipulator amid tariff war - AP News

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

The Nintendo Switch 2 is here: all of the launch news - theverge.com

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

Russia can stop this any time.

Is That Clint Eastwood Interview Real? Journalist Says It's Old Quotes - Variety

Let’s just make it real clear:

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

What’s next?

Why don't we hear our own snoring?

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Bianca Censori dares to bare in sheer black top and tiny shorts on NYC outing with Kanye West - Page Six

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

NASA spacecraft captures image of Japanese lander crash site on moon - KIRO 7 News Seattle